Categories
Forensic Science

All of the evidence we discussed would be considered “circumstantial evidence” i

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

All of the evidence we discussed would be considered “circumstantial evidence” in a court proceeding.
If you were presented a case (as a jury member) where there was no direct evidence (DNA, fingerprints), but there was a number of pieces of criminalistic evidence (hairs, fibers, ballistic evidence, glass, and paint), would you be able to declare a suspect as being guilty of the crime? Explain why.

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Leave a Reply