Business and Management

POST 200 WORDS The textbook discusses the need for and details of mock disasters

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

The textbook discusses the need for and details of mock disasters. In light of the recent workplace and school shootings, are organizations are doing enough to protect workers/students? Many law enforcement agencies are offering “active shooter” training. Should this type of event/mock disaster be a part of a crises management plan and can it be effective? How would you implement such a plan at your place of employment? Be specific with the response.
Reply to both below 150 words each
#1: Hello classmates,
Each organization has its own protocols and plans in place to address a crisis; however, some organizations depending on the field they are in might be more prepared than others. For instance, some school systems have metal detectors, auto-locking doors, camera systems, and on-campus resources officers. Unfortunately, not every school system has those resources. I am currently employed in a school system, and we do not always have an on-duty police officer on campus daily, but we do have cameras and automatic locking doors. Our local hospital only has one on-duty police officer. So, again, it just depends on how the organization feels; if they have a plan in place, then hopefully, they review it or update it on a yearly basis.
It never hurts to be prepared, and running a mock simulation could really benefit a school system. The mock should lay out clear details in the event a shooter does enter the building and how to proceed. The issue in schools is when actually to simulate the mock crisis. A school could attempt the mock crisis when teachers and staff report back; however, there would be no students on campus, so it wouldn’t feel like a real crisis because a major factor, for instance, the children, would not be a part of the equation. Option two is to simulate the crisis during the school year; however, the school faces the dilemma of telling the parents and hoping they do not tell the children. That way, the school can gauge almost every aspect of the crisis, but if parents do not agree with this, then enough parents could force the school to cancel the mock crisis. “The preparation phase of crisis management covers social, affective, cognitive, and physical factors therefore, widely accepted strategies for crisis preparedness refers interconnection of multiple elements and co-dependency of these elements rather than a systematic accumulation” (Gülyüz, 2021., as cited in Ganz, 1999; Brock, 2007).
Basically, schools should have crisis management mock drill scenarios; however, their effectiveness of them would be difficult to determine. Implementing the crisis at a school would probably proceed with the principal holding a conference with the faculty department leaders, the administration, and the police department to help brainstorm the mock crisis. Then the superintendent would review and greenlight the mock crisis. Followed by a faculty-only meeting to go over the crisis from start to finish, and at the end, take questions and accept feedback on a better strategy or different factors that need to be considered. Next, a mass email would be sent out to all parents, letting them know about the mock crisis. This email would also let them excuse their student for the day if they felt uncomfortable and if they had any questions to reach out to the principal for further explanations. The parents would also be given the option to inform their students of what is happening; however, in the email, it would also be said not to inform their children unless it involves a unique situation for the child.
The final phase would be initiating the crisis and afterward assessing what went right and what needs to be improved. The whole plan, in general, would most likely need to be reviewed multiple times. However, this is why a mock crisis should be running that way; the school system would be able to see any flaws in their system securities.
Thank you all,
Daisy Konter
Gülyüz D. (2021). Teachers’ perception of crisis management in schools. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching. Retrieved July 29, 2022, from (Links to an external site.)
#2:Hi class,
We are living in a time where, unfortunately, I believe that survival tactics are not only imperative in the workplace and schools. Any kind of survival tactic training will be effective. Regardless of the subject, the ability to provide training tools in any kind of survival scenario will be valuable to the student. In my workplace, an “active shooter” training would be very beneficial. I would develop and implement a crisis management plan where everyone would become educated and trained in their assigned role. My plan would be created by adapting the five steps of strategic management process. 1) External analysis. I should be diligent in recognizing potential threats to my workplace. 2) Internal analysis. This second step helps recognize the strengths and weaknesses of our environment, like the security measures established. 3) Strategy formulation. I would match the employee’s strengths and weaknesses with that of our environment. Everyone has an important role to play. Active shooter incidents, in many cases, have no pattern or method to the selection of victims, which results in an unpredictable and evolving situation. In the midst of the chaos, anyone can play an integral role in mitigating the impacts of an active shooter incident. (2016). 4) Strategy execution. At a minimum, active shooter event training should include mandatory annual viewing of videos demonstrating “Run, Hide, Fight” so staff members can see these survival tactics in action (Scott-Herring, 2022). The first response should be to run. If you can get out of the area where the shooting is occurring, you should. The second response is to hide. If an employee is unable to evacuate, they should find a place to hide, lock, and block. The last resort effort is to fight. If an employee’s life is in danger, he or she can attempt to incapacitate the shooter by using physical aggression and anything that can serve as a weapon and collaborating with team members (2014). The last step in the strategic management process is strategic control. If all else fails, what will our response be? There are many different ways to educate, train, and develop plans to implement in our organizations and schools. I think these mock disaster training scenarios are a great opportunity to prepare our community for any survival event.
Thank you,
Active shooter preparedness program fact sheet – cisa. (2016, January). Retrieved August 31, 2022, from
Implementing an active shooter training program. (2014). AORN Journal, 101(1).
Scott‐Herring, M. (2022). Active shooter preparedness: Is your or ready? AORN Journal, 115(6), 546–551.

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Leave a Reply